Questions
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
San Jose Sharks SJ ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.48 Proj Goals: 2.48
0 VOTES
Anaheim Ducks ANA ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.26 Proj Goals: 2.26
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.99 Proj Goals: 2.99
0 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
  • 0
    Liam (500 Reputation Points)
    I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.19 Proj Goals: 3.19
0 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 2.07 Proj Goals: 2.07
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.23 Proj Goals: 3.23
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.40 Proj Goals: 2.40
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 3.27 Proj Goals: 3.27
1 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.66 Proj Goals: 2.66
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Buffalo Sabres BUF CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.21 Proj Goals: 2.21
0 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.82 Proj Goals: 2.82
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
San Jose Sharks SJ ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.48 Proj Goals: 2.48
0 VOTES
Anaheim Ducks ANA ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.26 Proj Goals: 2.26
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 3.27 Proj Goals: 3.27
1 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.66 Proj Goals: 2.66
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.23 Proj Goals: 3.23
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.40 Proj Goals: 2.40
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
  • 0
    Liam (500 Reputation Points)
    I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.19 Proj Goals: 3.19
0 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 2.07 Proj Goals: 2.07
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.99 Proj Goals: 2.99
0 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Buffalo Sabres BUF CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.21 Proj Goals: 2.21
0 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.82 Proj Goals: 2.82
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
San Jose Sharks SJ ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.48 Proj Goals: 2.48
0 VOTES
Anaheim Ducks ANA ANA @ SJ Projected Goals: 2.26 Proj Goals: 2.26
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.19 Proj Goals: 3.19
0 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ MIN Projected Goals: 2.07 Proj Goals: 2.07
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 3.27 Proj Goals: 3.27
1 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.66 Proj Goals: 2.66
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.99 Proj Goals: 2.99
0 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.23 Proj Goals: 3.23
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.40 Proj Goals: 2.40
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Buffalo Sabres BUF CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.21 Proj Goals: 2.21
0 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ BUF Projected Goals: 2.82 Proj Goals: 2.82
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
  • 0
    Liam (500 Reputation Points)
    I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.

Sorry, there are no more questions for this feed.